Existentialist Ethical Thought In The Theatre Of Gabriel Marcel, Albert Camus, And Jean-Paul Sartre
Author: Helen Tattam
*Wait a few seconds for the document to load, the time may vary depending on your internet connection. If you prefer, you can download the file by clicking on the link below.
Information
Description: Existentialist Ethical Thought In The Theatre Of Gabriel Marcel, Albert Camus, And Jean-Paul Sartre por Helen Tattam explores the ethical dimensions of the plays of these key existentialist figures. It offers a comparative analysis of their dramatic works, focusing on how they grapple with morality and freedom.
Pages: 126
Megabytes: 0.63 MB
This may interest you
AN Existentialists Ethics
Extension: PDF | 22 pages
AN Existentialists Ethics por Alvin Plantinga examines Sartre's philosophy of freedom and its implications for morality. This paper delves into the inconsistencies within Sartre's analysis and challenges the notion of absolute freedom, offering a critical perspective for those exploring existentialist thought.
The Creation of Meaning – Simone de Beauvoir’s Existentialist Ethics
Extension: PDF | 18 pages
The Creation of Meaning - Simone de Beauvoir’s Existentialist Ethics por Pauline O’Flynn analyzes Beauvoir's development of existential ethics, particularly her emphasis on freedom, ambiguity, and the self/other relationship. Discover how Beauvoir reconciles individual and relational ethics, providing insights into human existence and ethical ideals.
Agnes Heller’s Existential Ethics and Bare Life
Extension: PDF | 13 pages
Agnes Heller’s Existential Ethics and Bare Life por John Grumley analyzes Heller's existential ethics, focusing on "turning contingency into destiny." It explores the relevance of her ideas by applying them to literary examples, offering a valuable lens for understanding ethical choices.
Consequential Existentialism – Qualifying Existential Responsibility (Article)
Extension: PDF | 5 pages
Consequential Existentialism - Qualifying Existential Responsibility (Article) by Lorenzo Nericcio explores the intersection of existentialism and rule consequentialism, suggesting the latter as a framework for making moral choices in line with existentialist thought. It argues that this approach can help individuals navigate the anguish of choosing for all humanity.
